|   | 
          Patriotic 
              Correctness 
              and other attacks on Academic Freedom 
              A Report by John K. Wilson 
            The Patriot Act isn’t 
              just a theoretical danger to civil liberties. Just ask Muslim scholar 
              Tariq Ramadan, who was hired by Notre Dame University’s Joan 
              B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies to teach this 
              fall. But the US government revoked Ramadan’s work visa in 
              July (after approving it in May) before he could come to America.Section 
              411 of the Patriot Act allows the government to ban anyone who has 
              “used his position of prominence within any country to endorse 
              or espouse terrorist activity ... in a way that the Secretary of 
              State has determined undermines United States efforts to reduce 
              or eliminate terrorist activities.” The government does not 
              offer an explanation for why Ramadan was banned from the country.Ramadan 
              wrote in the Chicago Tribune, “Anyone who has read any of 
              my 20 books, 700 articles or listened to any of my 170 audio-taped 
              lectures will discern a consistent message: The very moment Muslims 
              and their fellow citizens realize that being a Muslim and being 
              American or European are not mutually exclusive, they will enrich 
              their societies.” 
            The Network 
              for Education and Academic Rights issued an academic freedom alert 
              for the United States, the fifth time the US government has been 
              cited internationally for violating academic freedom since January 
              2002.A visa is not simply a license to enter the United States; 
              it is also a license to stay in the US. International scholars and 
              students in the US are all subject to having their visa revoked 
              at any time under this provision of the Patriot Act, without any 
              reason being given. And unlike some immigrants who can participate 
              in the underground economy and stay in the US after losing their 
              visa, it is impossible for a scholar targeted by the US government 
              to remain in this country and do academic work.  While any violation 
              of academic freedom is a serious matter, the Ramadan case is the 
              only one that directly impacts thousands of scholars and students 
              at colleges across the country. The Ramadan case also reveals the 
              rising power of conservative advocacy groups within the Bush Administration, 
              which pushed for H.R. 3077 to establish an International Higher 
              Education Advisory Board with broad investigative powers “to 
              study, monitor, apprise, and evaluate” activities of area 
              studies centers. Part of the effort to ban Ramadan from the 
              country was led by Daniel Pipes, an influential conservative who 
              was appointed to the US Institute for Peace. Pipes runs www.campus-watch.org, 
              and he assisted some French pro-Israel groups in lobbying the Bush 
              Administration to exclude Ramadan after his visa was initially approved. 
              Pipes has repeatedly defended his website, which posted what it 
              called “dossiers” on professors of Middle East Studies 
              that it deemed too left-wing, on the grounds that he was simply 
              criticizing these faculty, not infringing on their academic freedom. 
              The Ramadan case shows that Pipes goes far beyond criticism to helping 
              to coordinate attacks on academic freedom. The danger is clear: 
              under the Patriot Act, criticism of Israel is being categorized 
              as support for terrorism, and serves as justification for revoking 
              a visa. Yusof Islam, better known as Cat Stevens, was secretly put 
              on a no-fly list and banned from the US, apparently because he donated 
              money to Muslim charities that the US government thinks may be linked 
              to terrorist organizations. The growing right-wing network of 
              classroom spies makes the Ramadan and Islam examples particularly 
              dangerous. Websites like noindoctrination.org and studentsforacademicfreedom.org 
              allow students to post anonymously attacks on their professors and 
              what they say in class, without any verification of the accuracy 
              of the comments. Martin Kramer, one of the critics of Middle 
              East Studies, has noted gleefully to Middle East scholars, “You 
              are being watched. Those obscure articles in campus newspapers are 
              now available on the Internet, and they will be harvested. Your 
              syllabi, which you’ve also posted, will be scrutinized. Your 
              websites will be visited late at night.” Foreigners at 
              American universities must now literally watch what they say and 
              write, for fear that it might lead to banishment. 
            Silencing 
              Dissent on Campus 
              One of the most alarming trends of the past year has been the firing 
              of faculty who criticize their institutions. Shared governance means 
              little without the right of faculty to speak openly and critically.Penn 
              State Altoona: tenured theater professor Nona Gerard was accused 
              of “grave misconduct” and dismissed for criticizing 
              colleagues and programs in her department.  Academy of Art University: 
              creative writing instructor Jan Richman was fired after a student 
              wrote a story full of sex and violence, and was expelled. Cumberland 
              College: Robert Day, an assistant professor of social work, was 
              fired for creating a website, wecareforcumberland.com, which called 
              for financial and administrative reforms at the college. Shaw 
              University: a student was expelled from the dorms and a professor 
              fired for circulating a petition critical of the university president. 
              College of the Ozarks: Jon Davis, an assistant professor of biology, 
              was fired for revealing that an administrator had bought his doctorate 
              from a diploma mill. Benedict College: two professors were fired 
              for refusing to follow a school policy requiring 60% of the grades 
              for freshmen be based on effort. Benedict President David Swinton 
              accused the professors of “insubordination.”
             University 
              of Southern Mississippi: two professors were summarily fired for 
              investigating alleged resume inflation by a top administrator. In 
              a settlement with the university, the professors are banned from 
              criticizing the administration.  
             The 
              Politics of Controversy on Campus 
              Bans on political 
              speakers or requirements for “balance” create a dangerous 
              atmosphere for academic freedom on campus. An effort to ban Michael 
              Moore from campus does not silence Moore; but it certainly intimidates 
              students and faculty who may want to express similar ideas and feel 
              that they have been prohibited from campus. Lacking Moore’s 
              outspokenness and celebrity status, these individuals are likely 
              to remain silent.Utah Valley State College: public outcry over a 
              planned Oct. 20, 2004 speech on campus by Michael Moore led President 
              William Sederburg (a former Republican state senator) to order student 
              leaders to find a conservative speaker to “balance” 
              Moore.  California State University at San Marcos: the president 
              rescinded support for Moore’s speech, claiming that state 
              law compelled the university not to pay for a speaker with strong 
              political views. After protests, Moore’s speech was moved 
              to a larger arena off campus and privately financed. Yeshiva 
              University: The Israel Club dis-invited Israeli Defense Forces refusnik 
              Guy Grossman after the other speaker in a planned debate withdrew. 
              Reportedly, the group was “under pressure from those who feared 
              the consequences of giving an ‘open forum’ to a left-wing 
              speaker.”
             Bucknell University: 
              general counsel Wayne Bromfield refused to allow Congressman Pat 
              Toomey to give an April 8, 2004 speech on campus about “civic 
              engagement” because of a policy banning political speakers. 
              Ralph Nader, however, was paid to give the University’s commencement 
              address because the event was scheduled before he announced plans 
              to run for president. Toomey instead spoke nearby off-campus.  
              Calvin College: a student who listed an interest in gay rights in 
              a Congressional internship application had his application sent 
              to Barney Frank’s office, but an adviser at the college told 
              the student not to do an internship in a “homosexual environment.” 
              When David Halpern, program supervisor at the Washington Center 
              for Internships and Academic Seminars, objected to reassigning the 
              student based on the adviser’s beliefs, Halpern was fired 
              the next day. Le Moyne College: in fall 2003 refused to allow 
              a speaker from Call to Action to talk on campus, claiming that a 
              full dialogue required an opposing speaker. University of California 
              at Berkeley: three students, Rachel Odes, Michael Smith and Snehal 
              Shingavi were found guilty of “disturbing the peace” 
              for a peaceful anti-war sit-in at Sproul Hall’s front lobby. 
              Although all criminal charges were dropped, the three students were 
              selected for punishment by the university, not allowed to offer 
              a defense for their actions, and convicted in absentia. Forsyth 
              Technical Community College: writing teacher Elizabeth Ito was fired 
              for spending 10 minutes in a class criticizing the war in Iraq in 
              Spring 2003, and refusing to promise never to mention the war in 
              class again. Drake University: A Nov. 15, 2003 Drake forum on 
              “Stop the Occupation! Bring the Iowa Guard Home!” sponsored 
              by the Drake chapter of the National Lawyers Guild included nonviolence 
              training for activists. The next day, 12 protesters were arrested 
              at an anti-war rally at Iowa National Guard headquarters in Johnston. 
              Because of this, Drake University was ordered in a Feb. 4 2004 subpoena 
              from an FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force to give up “all documents 
              indicating the purpose and intended participants in the meeting, 
              and all documents or recordings which would identify persons that 
              actually attended the meeting” and any campus security records 
              “reflecting any observations made of the Nov. 15, 2003, meeting, 
              including any records of persons in charge or control of the meeting, 
              and any records of attendees of the meeting.” Drake University 
              was also ordered not to tell anyone about the subpoena. The subpoena 
              was eventually dropped. University of Texas at Austin: on Feb. 
              2, 2004, Army intelligence agents asked for information about people 
              who attended a law school conference on about Islamic law and sexism. 
              Army agents visited several campus offices seeking a list of those 
              who attended and a videotape. The Army admitted that the visit overstepped 
              its rules. “The special agents and their detachment commander 
              exceeded their authority by requesting information about individuals 
              who were not within the Army’s counterintelligence investigative 
              jurisdiction.”  
            
              | 
            |